← Back to Explore
Article / CT–00001
Fires

The Great Fire of London

A fire that began in a Pudding Lane bakery spread across the densely built City of London during dry, windy weather. Over four days it consumed most of the medieval city, destroyed thousands of homes and major civic and religious buildings, and displaced roughly 100,000 people. Recorded deaths were few, but records almost certainly understate the full human cost.

Background

London was still recovering from the plague year of 1665. Inside the old city walls, narrow streets held timber-framed buildings, warehouses, workshops, and combustible goods close together. Parishes kept hooks, ladders, buckets, and simple pumps, but there was no professional municipal fire brigade.

What happened

The fire began around 1 a.m. at Thomas Farriner’s bakery. The precise ignition is unknown; a spark or ember from an oven is a plausible explanation. A dry summer, strong easterly wind, delayed firebreaks, and tightly packed wooden buildings transformed a local fire into a citywide disaster.

Timeline

About 1 a.m., 2 September

Fire discovered

Fire is discovered at Thomas Farriner’s bakery on Pudding Lane.

2–4 September

Fire crosses the City

Strong wind and combustible buildings carry the fire west; Old St Paul’s and the Royal Exchange burn.

5–6 September

Fire brought under control

The wind weakens and expanded firebreaks help stop the spread.

By 1676

Most rebuilding completed

Much of the damaged area has been rebuilt, largely on its former street pattern.

Aftermath

Relief, temporary shelter, and the immense work of tracing property claims began immediately. Although ambitious plans proposed rebuilding London on a new grid, legal and financial realities meant that most streets followed their earlier routes.

Long-term consequences

Rebuilding rules favored brick and stone, streets were widened in places, and new institutions for fire insurance and organized firefighting developed. Christopher Wren’s St Paul’s Cathedral and the Monument became permanent landmarks of the reconstructed city.

Significance

The fire shows how building materials, street form, governance, weather, and emergency decisions combine to create urban risk. It also demonstrates that reconstruction can transform safety standards while preserving the underlying geography of a city.

What remains today

The Monument stands near Pudding Lane, and much of the City still follows medieval street alignments. Archaeological evidence, government papers, eyewitness accounts, churches, and the rebuilt St Paul’s make the event legible in today’s landscape.

Uncertainty

The often-repeated official death total is not a reliable measure of all who died. The source of ignition is also not known with certainty. Contemporary accusations against foreign or religious minorities were unsupported and led to persecution.

References

These reviewed sources support the article. Open the claim notes to see which evidence supports specific statements.

How the sources support this article 4 claims
  1. Quick read

    A fire that began in a Pudding Lane bakery spread across the densely built City of London during dry, windy weather.

  2. Trigger and conditions

    The fire began around 1 a.m.

  3. Uncertainty

    The often-repeated official death total is not a reliable measure of all who died.

  4. Why it matters

    The fire shows how building materials, street form, governance, weather, and emergency decisions combine to create urban risk.

  1. 01
    The Great Fire of London

    London Museum

    Overview of the fire, its contested details, displacement, and rebuilding. Open original Trace this source →
  2. 02
    Great Fire of London: Examine the Evidence

    The National Archives

    Primary documents and contextual analysis of the fire and contemporary blame. Open original Trace this source →
  3. 03
    100 Places: Loss & Destruction — The Monument, Pudding Lane

    Historic England

    Public heritage account of the Pudding Lane origin, four-day fire, destruction, rebuilding, and the Monument. Open original Trace this source →